What you'd need to do is this:
Which should look like:
"What you'd need to do is this:
[ img ]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_u0UitR4lCV8/T ... rp+300.jpg[ / img ]
Except that there shouldn't be any spaces in the {img} and {/img} tags. Or you can just highlight the image URL with the mouse, and click the "Img" button along the top of the message. And a cat's severed head.
Kodak nc2000e gallery on Flickr
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:04 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: England
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:53 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Kodak nc2000e gallery on Flickr
Ahh. Very Cool! I was doing it completely wrong, obviously. I was taking the html code of the photo from the blog html edit window.
I shall try it again soon. Thanks very much! I'll skip the cat's severed head step!! lol!
I shall try it again soon. Thanks very much! I'll skip the cat's severed head step!! lol!
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:53 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Kodak nc2000e gallery on Flickr
Here's a post I just completed comparing three cameras looking at the same scene.
http://snapolson.blogspot.com/2010/07/r ... rison.html
The article I've posted compares an image from the nc2000e, a Kodak DCS-330, and a Fuji 6800z (point-and-shoot):
http://snapolson.blogspot.com/2010/07/r ... rison.html
The article I've posted compares an image from the nc2000e, a Kodak DCS-330, and a Fuji 6800z (point-and-shoot):
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:04 pm
- antispam: No
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: Kodak nc2000e gallery on Flickr
That's a good advert for the DCS 330. I know very little about it - the only sample image I have seen is this one, which is terrible:snapabraham wrote:Here's a post I just completed comparing three cameras looking at the same scene.
http://snapolson.blogspot.com/2010/07/r ... rison.html
The article I've posted compares an image from the nc2000e, a Kodak DCS-330, and a Fuji 6800z (point-and-shoot):
http://www.imaging-resource.com/EVENTS/ ... 30_250.HTM
I informally compared my DCS 520 with a Canon Powershot G2, which was a very sharp four megapixel compact. The G2 resolved finer details and wasn't all that bad at ISO 400, and it had a hot shoe, so I tended to use that as a backup rather than the 520. Although the DCS 520's interface was much better (the G2, irritatingly, didn't have a post-capture histogram, and you had to keep rotating the stiff mode dial from "record" to "playback" to see the image).